Mac OS X 10.6.2 vs. Ubuntu 9.10 Benchmarks

Back in August upon the launch of Apple’s Snow Leopard we delivered benchmarks comparing Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 along with initial benchmarks of how Ubuntu 9.10 was running against Mac OS X 10.6. Since that time though Ubuntu 9.10 has been officially released with various changes since last August and Apple has issued two point releases for Snow Leopard, now putting it at version 10.6.2. As we await the release of FreeBSD 8.0 to deliver a larger operating system comparison, we have carried out a fresh round of tests comparing Mac OS X 10.6.2 and Ubuntu 9.10 (both x86 and x86_64 editions) under a variety of tests.

Similar to our August tests, we used a newer Apple Mac Mini for our Snow Leopard vs. Karmic Koala benchmarks. This Mac Mini is made up of an Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 clocked at 2.00GHz, NVIDIA MCP79 motherboard Chipset, 1GB of DDR3-1067MHz system memory, a 120GB Fujitsu MHZ2120B SATA HDD, and a NVIDIA GeForce 9400 512MB graphics processor. For some important version numbers when it comes to the software side, Mac OS X 10.6.2 is using the 10.2.0 kernel, X Server 1.4.2-apple45, OpenGL 2.1 NVIDIA-1.6.6, GCC 4.2.1, and a Journaled HFS+ file-system. Ubuntu 9.10 final has to offer the Linux 2.6.31-14-generic kernel, GNOME 2.28.1, X Server 1.6.4, OpenGL 3.2.0 NVIDIA 190.42, GCC 4.4.1, and an EXT4 file-system. The same package set is shared between the x86 and x86_64 editions, albeit a different CPU architecture. Like our other operating system comparisons, we are strictly looking at the “out of the box” performance for both Ubuntu and Mac OS X.

Read on…

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

BFS vs. Mainline Scheduler Benchmarks and Measurements

Kernel developer Ingo Molnar has benchmarked his Completely Fair Scheduler (CFS) with the recently released BFS from Con Kolivas.

From the article:

“I understand that BFS is still early code and that you are not targeting BFS for mainline inclusion – but BFS is an interesting and bold new approach, cutting a _lot_ of code out of kernel/sched*.c, so it raised my curiosity and interest :-)

Read on…

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 9.5/10 (2 votes cast)

Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 4 Benchmarks

Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 4 was released last week and with all of its updated packages and changes compared to Ubuntu 9.04, we decided to carry out a fresh round of benchmarks comparing Ubuntu 9.04 to Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 4. We used a Samsung NC10 for testing with an Intel Atom N270, 2GB of DDR2 memory, a 32GB OCZ Core Series V2 SSD, and Intel 945GME graphics.

The benchmarks we ran via the Phoronix Test Suite were OpenArena, Tremulous, LAME MP3 encoding, FFmpeg, 7-Zip compression, PostMark, SQLite, OpenSSL, GnuPG, John The Ripper, Stream, dcraw, PyBench, GtkPerf, and QGears2.

Read on…

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Mindcraft 2.0: Firefox Comes of Age

Not many people remember the Mindcraft saga, which took place just over ten years ago. That’s a pity, because it was an important moment in the rise of GNU/Linux, and in the way Microsoft tried to fight it.

It seems that Microsoft has learned at least something from its past mistakes. With two new benchmarking studies, carried out by NSS Labs, the company has admitted from the start that it paid for the work (although this fact doesn’t seem to be mentioned anywhere in the reports themselves, or on the Web site, that I can see – can anyone find anything?)

But in another important respect, the company has learned nothing. Unsurprisingly, the benchmarks show that Internet Explorer 8 is “better” than Firefox – Microsoft wouldn’t have published them otherwise. But, as with the Mindcraft report ten years ago, the very existence of the report shows that Microsoft is now officially worried about Firefox’s growing success.

Read on…

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Arch Linux 2009.08 Benchmarks

Arch Linux 2009.08 was released earlier this week with a new installer, more automatic configuration settings, many core package updates, and other changes to this growingly popular distribution. At the request of some readers, we have carried out some quick benchmarks to get a general understanding of where Arch Linux 2009.08 is performing in comparison to Ubuntu 9.04.

We were using Arch Linux 2009.08 (x86_64) with the Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.26, X Server 1.6.3, the NVIDIA 185.18.31 display driver, GCC 4.4.1, and an EXT4 file-system.

In comparison, with our Ubuntu 9.04 (x86_64) tests were the Linux 2.6.28 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.0, NVIDIA 185.18.31, GCC 4.3.3, and an EXT3 file-system.

Our test system was an ASRock NetTop ION 330, which packs an Intel Atom 330 CPU, an ASRock AMCP7A-ION (NVIDIA MCP79) motherboard with GeForce 9400M graphics, and 2GB of DDR2 memory.

Read on…

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)